Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations
On Fri, Oct 24 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> OTOH, I do understand the desire to put such (diminishing) exceptions
> to a referendum instead of leaving them implicit, and am happy to vote
> for a GR that makes clear to our users the state of affairs in lenny.
Well said. I think we should indeed have that GR.
> I also encourage the kernel team to pursue the patches that Ben
> Hutchings has so wonderfully provided for this latest round of bugs.
> They need to be weighed against the risk of regression, but they
> should still be considered for inclusion in lenny. Kudos to those who
> are actually doing the legwork to fix the bugs.
Is this being pursued? I have tested the kernel source Ben put
out, but my hardware is sadly mainstream and does not require the
modules in question, so my testing is of doubtful value.
manoj
--
Others may not understand that we must practice self-control, but
quarrelling dies away in those who understand this fact. 6
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: