On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:06:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:41:05PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 21 October 2008, you wrote: > > > > > But, in fact, fixes are not welcome from the team. They have raised a > > > > > major roadblock, allowing only one kind of fix which requires a lot of > > > > > work, and rejecting anything simpler. > > > > > > > > Ever hear of the Technical Committee? > > > > > > The Technical Committee is not empowered to override foundation documents. > > > > > > > 6.1.4 of the constitution should help you in this case. > > I don't see how does 6.1.4 enable the TC to override foundation documents. > Did I miss something? > The need for the TC to override a foundation document. If you have what you believe to be a fix that's not welcome from the team, and they want a different one, the TC could use 6.1.4 to rule in your favour (or more precisely, against the team that your course of action should be taken). Perhaps I'm mis-reading the above. Which bit of the foundation documents do you think would need overriding for the tech-ctte to rule on which fix to take? Thanks, Neil -- <blarson> I use three different operating systems: Sarge, Etch, and Sid.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature