please comment on the draft (last call)
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: please comment on the draft (last call)
- From: Robert Millan <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:40:57 +0200
- Message-id: <20081023154057.GA1048@thorin>
- In-reply-to: <20081021145242.GA22436@thorin>
- References: <20081021145242.GA22436@thorin>
I haven't seen any reply requesting specific adjustments to the draft; some
of the replies objecting to the proposal as a whole hinted at specific
improvements, but nobody wanted to followup on these:
- Change the exceptions so that it also covers Glibc and possibly other
components, instead of just firmware.
- Make it explicit that moving a package to non-free as a result of the
rules stablished by this GR does not imply that the whole archive must
inmediately move to contrib (note: the current SC doesn't enforce
moving packages to contrib, but it is generally considered a technical
bug when main is not self-contained).
Does someone think the proposal should be adjusted in either of these ways,
or in others?
If not, I'll resend it as a proposal and ask for seconds shortly.
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."