Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:31:34PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Which means that as per SC #4 you're welcome to package those firmware blobs
> > and provide them in the non-free repository.
> That's exactly what I meant, instead of simply dropping support of
> hardware, as you suggested a few times in this thread.
So, maybe what I said was confusing. Let me clarify it:
We don't have to drop support for any hardware as long as there's a volunteer
who wants to support it in non-free.
And that volunteer is not me. It may be you, or anyone else. As long as there
is one, SC #4 garantees that they can use the project's resources for this
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."