On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:20 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 23:28 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > > Would it be a good compromise between SCs #1, #3 and #4 if we made an > > exhaustive list of non-free bits in main, and make it our goal that the > > list gets smaller between each release and not to add anything to > > that list? > > I would be entirely happy with that. But I have just been told by > William Pitcock that apparently we are required somehow to support new > hardware with non-free software too. So it's not a decreasing list, > it's an accordion list with no real commitment to the DFSG at all. Do not put words into my mouth. I simply stated that user experience is an important factor, and that if free drivers (*FREE*) which depend on non-free firmware are available, and the firmware is inline, then it should not block Lenny's release. William
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part