Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ‘lenny-ignore’?
On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> Btw, I'm looking for supporters for a GR to stop this gross violation
> of the SC. Any DDs who read this, please let me know if you're
Actually, I think we need a GR on the lines of
| General Resolution: Handling source-less firmware in the Linux kernel
To get a special dispensation for lenny.
If someone were to propose such a GR, I would second it. If the
DPL gives us leave to cut down discussion and voting to a week, we
could get the decision in a couple of weeks.
I do not think that willfully violating the social contract is a
decision for a few delegates to make -- we, as a project, should
acknowledge the need for and make a special exception to release Debian
with known non-free bits in it.
If Machiavelli were a programmer, he'd have worked for AT&T.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C