Re: Technical committee resolution
- To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Technical committee resolution
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 21:39:20 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 18418.40312.333722.959378@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>
- In-reply-to: <87y782xn22.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
- References: <20080310024828.GA1079@blae.erisian.com.au> <20080322031705.GB19432@keid.carnet.hr> <18411.61353.680709.270312@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <18411.61505.40271.842025@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <20080328203810.GA7988@scowler.net> <20080329013729.GB15689@kodama.kitenet.net> <87y782xn22.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: Technical committee resolution"):
> As RMS would say on emacs-dev; a decision like this should be
> made by polling the suers (not a vote -- polling them for opinions
> _and_ reasons.
>
> The TC would have been equally wrong body to make this decision.
One of the functions of the TC is be to decide what the right criteria
are for a decision, including the idea that we should perhaps poll
users, or do research.
If we poll the users and ask for reasons and so on, then ultimately
someone has to evaluate the responses and make a decison.
Ian.
Reply to: