Re: Question for all candidates: inter-dependancy of works the growing Debian project.
Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:07:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:50:27AM +0900, Paul Wise a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Charles Plessy
> > <charles-debian-nospam@plessy.org> wrote:
> >
> > > (building non-free on official autobuilders is not allowed).
> >
> > Untrue, you just need to get your package whitelisted since non-free
> > packages may not be legal to autobuild. You need to contact aba IIRC.
> > Not sure why you don't know about this, nor where the best place to
> > store this information is, perhaps the NM templates should cover it.
Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 07:13:47AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>
> FTR, d-d-a: <20061129152824.GT2560@mails.so.argh.org>.
Hi all,
this d-d-a message, as well as the fact that buildd.net lists different
names for the non-free buildds, and the fact that buildd.d.o does not
display the name of the buildds nor the logs for the autobuilt non-free
packages, strongly suggest that "building non-free on official
autobuilders is not allowed" is not "Untrue".
Friends, it is not the first time that threads start on such
misunderstandings, and I think that we could dramatically raise the
level of lists like as -devel by taking more time between reading an
email and answering to it.
(And since this thread is supposed to be questions for the DPL
candidates, I will add one: some time ago, a DD was sending emails on
-devel whenever the discussion was offtopic, to ask for it to be
transferred or stopped: what do you think of this initiative ?).
Have a nice day,
--
Charles
Reply to: