[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Supermajority requirement off-by-one error, and TC chairmanship

Hi Florian,

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 01:45:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit:

> >   Well, maybe we could avoid some bike-shedding. While Ian was too busy
> > writing mails in capital letters, explaining how Debian should weigh in
> > the IETF RFC drafting,

> The IETF will probably remove Rule 9 altogether (for both IPv4 and IPv6,
> since the TLA/NLA/SLA model is dead and we're heading for IPv4-style
> portable addresses in IPv6 land, too).

Is this speculation, or have you heard this from the IETF?  I would be happy
to have it confirmed that the IETF is on the road to fixing this bug, and
would gladly do what I can to encourage a positive outcome.

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Reply to: