Re: Results for General Resolution: Endorse concept of Debian maintainers
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat Aug 04, 2007 at 19:54:00 -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The resolution passes, with 386 votes from 345 developers.
> >
>
> > The winners are:
> > Option 1 "Endorse the concept of Debian Maintainers"
> >
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> >
>
> So what is the next step now?
>
> I propose that i reassign all my applicants to aj/buxy and stop being
> AM... Who else will do that?
Sweet.
However, are you sure that burrying NM is a proper response to this
bypass? What I found very interesting is that several new DDs who
went through NM considered it proper and educating. Only the last
step meant too much waiting (DAM stage, we all know that). Thus,
in general, I am not sure that ditching NM would be the proper
action.
Regards,
Joey
--
It's time to close the windows.
Reply to: