Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process
Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:52:58AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> >I agree. No reason was given AFAICS, so I propose:
>
> From AJ's original mail:
> ...
> >Likewise, all our other votes have only needed two weeks (or less in
> >the case of the recall votes) to resolve, so having an extra week for
> >DPL elections seems unnecessary.
I see that as a reason to reduce the voting period, not the election.
> >Reducing the DPL election period from 17% of the year to 11% seems
> >like a win to me. YMMV.
Such arbitrary calculations aren't reasons. One can just as well note
that the DPL election period is only approximately 0% of the period
where the DPL's decisions can have effects.
Regards,
--
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Experienced webmaster-developers for hire http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
Also: statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, workers co-op.
Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
Reply to: