On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 05:40:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: As of kFreeBSD: > a. kfreebsd -- easy! > i. add it to the archive! > - straight after etch release? that's the matter of the discussion here, and it's not up to the kfreebsd porters, but the ftp-master, who you are speaking in the name of if I'm not mistaken. I see strong opposition here, which I still do not undertand. > - promote ging livecd? I think it's already the case, it's documented on the wiki pages about kfreebsd. > - do a vmware-format image? A Qemu image would be way more adequate IMHO. but that's definitely doable. > - update archive qualification page? I'm still missing what's really missing from it, except a couple of developers which is well not a real problem. > ii. intro and demos at debconf? > iii. developer accessible machines? They already exist. kfreebsd also has enough buildd's (redundancy et al. a thing that not all official arch have). > iv. kfreebsd strike force? it exists, look at the différent lists on alioth for the *-bsd-* projects. > v. piuparts or other automated testing infrastructure? Oh that's new, I wasn't aware the official RC arch did had such an infrastructure ! > vi. release consideration? That's not required to be in SCC afaict, though I reckon it would be great. But one goal at a time seems reasonnable and IMHO it's not to be decided before inclusion. > vii. installation methods? Ging works. Some GSoC were submited to port d-i but maybe it was only for hurd and I'm mistaken. Again it's not a big concern while it's not a released arch. > ...and see who wants to sign up to help with the different parts and > flesh bits out, and if there are any other ways to exceed expectations > on each of the various points. But I don't know if that /is/ the goal > you're going for overall, or if it's something different. > > Cheers, > aj > -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpex6VRryKzG.pgp
Description: PGP signature