Question to the candidates: inclusion of the kFreeBSD-* ports
Hi DPL candidates,
The kFreeBSD ports are now in a good enough shape to be included in
unstable. Aurélien Jarno got ftpmaster's approval for that during an
informal conversation at debconf5 [1] but so far, there's been no
progress on this front.
Since then, the SCC split happened and ftp-master moved to ries, so
adding more architectures to the archive is no longer a problem, AIUI.
Hence, what is your position on including those new, non-Linux ports ?
What would the timeframe be like, according to you ?
If an ftpmaster was to charge an amount of money to include the new
architectures (as was the case for amd64), what would, according to
you, be a reasonable amount ?
Thanks,
JB.
[1] <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/glibc-bsd-devel/2005-July/000453.html>
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jblache@debian.org>
Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169
GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169
Reply to: