[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ideas about a GR to fix the DAM

On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 07:29:10AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 09:00:43PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:

> >      And at the time he was kind of right, [...], so he was
> >      rejecting the delays on the ???over-administrative-thing??? NM has
> >      become since he created the concept (at the time it was a

> Uh, where'd that myth come from?


> Since that time it's gotten quite a bit more procedural still (with
> question lists, and rules about contributions before applying, and not
> passing through without already being an active maintainer, and aiui on
> average a much more thorough review of applicants).

I think that these changes are a much bigger deal than you're making
them out to be here: the current new maintainer process feels very
different to how it felt when the DAM/FD/AM based system was first

"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: