Re: Ideas about a GR to fix the DAM

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Ideas about a GR to fix the DAM
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:29:52 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20071117192952.GQ23935@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20071117184856.GA13967@blae.erisian.com.au>
References: <[🔎] 20071117133625.GA4274@helena.mario.local> <[🔎] 20071117184856.GA13967@blae.erisian.com.au>

* Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> [2007-11-18 04:48]:
> DAM (and FD, and AMs and nm.debian.org) is a policy position -- it's
> about deciding who's allowed to do what, rather than a technical
> position that involves keeping some software/hardware working; it's
> very subjective and that's about it. Adding more DAMs (or AMs or FD
> members etc) is straightforward.

Actually, it's not straightforward, simply because "deciding who's
allowed to do what" is not straightforward.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ideas about a GR to fix the DAM
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

References:
- Ideas about a GR to fix the DAM
  - From: Mario Iseli <mario@debian.org>
- Re: Ideas about a GR to fix the DAM
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Ideas about a GR to fix the DAM
Next by Date: Re: Ideas about a GR to fix the DAM
Previous by thread: Re: Ideas about a GR to fix the DAM
Next by thread: Re: Ideas about a GR to fix the DAM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread