Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
> 2. The election begins [-nine-] {+six+} weeks before the leadership
> post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately.
Is there any reason to reduce this time period? Having a buffer zone
of three weeks is useful for continuity and/or cases where the
nomination period must be extended (though it leads to a short lame
duck period).
Don Armstrong
--
When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one
by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.
-- Edmund Burke "Thoughts on the Cause of Present Discoontents"
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: