Re: GR idea related to ongoing licensing discussions
Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> wrote:
> email@example.com wrote:
> >Marco d'Itri claimed existance of such DFSG-revisionists in
> >(apologies for the "fraudster" shout in my first reply) but went all
> >quiet when I showed that it looks like non-money fees were DFSG
> >breaches before debian-legal even existed...
> Yes, I went all quiet because (as I already explained to you at least
> once) I was relocating and staring a new job (which is much more
> interesting than posting to Debian lists, so I rarely read them nowadays).
Maybe relocating, but not on VAC AFAICS and still active on various
lists, including debian-legal, for at least a week after the above and
still haven't produced *any* references to suggest that such
DFSG-1-revisionists exist, despite another request in March.
> Can't you come up with anything better than this?
Why do I need to? Can you show that those DFSG-1-revisionists exist?
If not, stop trolling.
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct