[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue



On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:44:30 +0200, Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> wrote:

I'm curious to know how you reconcile Social Contract §1 and DFSG §3,
and the fact that we distribute non-modifiable texts in Debian.

Easy. DFSG §3 talks about the software, and a license is not software - neither source not binary. The "S" in DFSG is "software". As long as the *software* is free, the license need not
be.

/L :)
--
Lasse R. Nielsen - atwork@infimum.dk
 'Faith without judgement merely degrades the spirit divine'
Reproduction of this message, or parts thereof, is allowed if proper attribution is given.



Reply to: