Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue
Ben Finney writes ("Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue"):
> Ian Jackson <email@example.com> writes:
> > The status quo is quite fine and should be left as it is.
> This doesn't address the concern that motivated this discussion: that
> the license texts which have restrictions on modification are non-free
> works by the DFSG, yet are being distributed in Debian against the
> Social Contract.
This concern DOES NOT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. It needs to be IGNORED.
Don't you people have anything better to do ?!