Re: Question to the candidates: inclusion of the kFreeBSD-* ports
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> I'd love to be proved wrong on kfreebsd's value to users and the project.
I'm having a hard time figuring out, from this thread, what would
constitute proof for you. Are you looking specifically for high popcon
numbers? Lots of developers stepping forward and saying they're working
on kfreebsd? Those are the only things I've been able to glean from this
thread that you feel are missing.
I'd personally find it frustrating and demoralizing if, after working
really hard on a project for quite some time, I asked for it to be
included and got back "mmm, sorry, no, you didn't blow me away, but I'm
not going to tell you what would blow me away so that you could remedy
it." I don't think that's what you're really trying to say, but I'm not
sure I can figure out what you *are* trying to say from this thread.
(Of course, this probably also isn't the right forum.)
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: