On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 09:58:48AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le dimanche 04 mars 2007 à 18:13 +1000, Anthony Towns a écrit : > > I'm not seeing why you need to be in the archive to do NMUs to improve > > packages? > Because some maintainers refuse such NMUs for unofficial architectures. This sounds like a problem independant of this particular port - do people give reasons for this? If the patch is invasive or likely to have additional problems I can understand a response like that (indeed, one of my packages has such a patch) but I can't imagine too many packages would run into that sort of issue. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature