Hey *, As per [0], here's my nomination for the DPL election... FWIW, my thoughts on the "DPL team" concept is that the best way to select members for the team pretty much matches the way we select a DPL -- have folks list the things they think they can do to improve Debian over the coming year, face review and criticism of those ideas and their ability to implement it, and then poll developers to see what they think of the candidates. At least, I thought knowing where Steve stood and having seen what he's like when he's put under a bit of pressure was helpful in working with him and trusting him over the past year; not to mention knowing that a lot of developers respected his leadership qualities. I wanted to say that somewhere before nominations closed in case it affected anyone's decision to nominate themselves. If you've got some cool ideas to propose, or want to be on a DPL team, you might also like to consider "pseudo-nominating" -- ie, posting a platform of what you'd like to do while people are thinking about these things, without actually formally volunteering for DPL. Of course, at this point any further nominations will presumably overflow devotee :) Cheers, aj [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/02/msg00687.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature