Hrm, platforms seem to be up (mostly), so I guess that makes it "answer questions" time. On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:01:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > 1. The past two years have seen higher numbers of candidates standing for DPL > than in the past. [...] what do you think about having seven candidates in > this election? I think it's largely a good thing; though I think the vote software will need some changes to cope with more than eight options, at least in its reporting. > Is it a healthy thing that we have so many developers willing > to sit in the hot seat, or is it a sign of fragmentation in the project > and a lack of strong leadership? There looks like there's a lot of commonality in many of the platforms; so I don't think it's fragmentation. Personally, I'd rather have a bunch of good people competing for every positon -- and I think if we can maintain that level of interest and participation, even as we improve other things and provide other ways to participate, it'll be very healthy. > 2. If you are elected, do you currently think you would be interested in > running for re-election next year? Why or why not? I expect so -- the details might change, but I expect Debian will still be interesting then, and will still have problems I could help work on, so my rationale would be the same. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature