-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 06.04.2006 um 19:06 schrieb Sam Hocevar:
"As a special exception, the license may forbid use of
technical measures to restrict access or use of the software
itself, as long as the license author promises that such a
clause will be rescinded real soon now."
That is gum. What is "promise"? You cannot have such things in the DFSG. It is washing the DFSG out as the amendment would do.
Before you make any change to the DFSG, you'd better discuss and vote about "Accepting FDL" needs/does not need a DFSG change. Vut in my point of view thsi question was already coverd by the GR.
Looks like people wanting to have more software currently counted as non-free or contrib in main look for chance to wash DFSG out. Pleas think about the side effects, if DFSG is changed.
Greetings Jutta- -- http://www.witch.westfalen.de
http://witch.muensterland.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkQ1V7IACgkQOgZ5N97kHkdpKgCgpHiqA8DFJH2fRhvU6MWAgM8w oOcAoJdyETp/nak1MqNk+uw03O+byMO0 =hOUr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----