Re: DFSG4 and combined works
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 03:33:10PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> So I don't understand what you're trying to get at, or what possible
> relevance this theoretical discussion could have to anything else we're
> talking about.
If we have many documents covered under GFDL and all of them contain
different invariant sections, it might be impractical to combine all
of them into a new document. This was used as an evidence that GFDL
is a non-free license. My point was that this can not be used as an
argument that GFDL is non-free because GFDL explicitly permits
licenses that disallow any combined works.
Anton Zinoviev
Reply to: