This one time, at band camp, MJ Ray said: > The current opinion of FSF, at least. In the past, RMS has > worked against advertising clauses far less obnoxious than > the FDL ones. You could summarise what's happening today with > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html and doing s/BSD/FDL/g; > s/sentence/chapter/g; s/system/manual/g; > s/University of California/GNU Manifesto/g and similar: Er, we consider the 4 clause BSD license a free license. By comparing the FDL and the 4 clause BSD license this way, you are making me think that either you didn't know the 4 clause BSD license is considered free, or you think the FDL is as well. Again, the FSF's opinion doesn't matter here. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature