Re: Anton's amendment
On 2/1/06, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:
> Could some one tell me why including the invariant sections of
> a GFDL licensed work in main would not require us to modify the DFSG
> or the social contract?
I think it's clear that the DFSG would have to be modified.
If nothing else, the DFSG's "may restrict ... _only_" clause does not
allow include this case, because patches which would change
invariant sections at build time are not allowed.
More literally, the answer to your question seems to be:
"No, not meaningfully."
On the other hand, we've had strong majorities for good suggestions
in the past. So "DFSG would have to be modified" should not
be considered an obstacle -- we just have a somewhat stiffer
requirement that the idea be a good one.
--
Raul
Reply to: