On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 16:55 -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 10:10:22AM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > > Those in favour of two separate GR's: > > > > * Read my GR proposal [0] and second it (your choice of course). > > * Read Nathanael's amendment proposal [1] to my proposal. A DD > > needs to send it as a reply to my proposal so that it becomes an > > officially proposed amendment (*). I will second it, and suggest > > others do too (again, your choice or course). > > * Send any other amendment proposals as replies to my proposal. I > > will consider seconding them as well. > > * After the first GR has been decided, we can consider what to say > > in the position statement (or choose to say nothing). > > > > (*) Can I do that without cancelling my original proposal? I'm not sure. > > I don't believe there is any issue with that. Or, at least, I don't see > why one person can't make an amendment to there own proposal and want it > as a seperate choice one the ballot. That would seem sensible, and I think the constitution allows for this. In any case, since Nathanael has withdrawn his amendment proposal with additional concerns, I won't propose it. Thanks, -- Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe@paniq.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part