Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Russ Allbery wrote:
> In that case, could someone please propose an amendment which captures the
> *other* regularly voiced opinion, namely that GFDL without invarient
> sections is DFSG-free but with invarient sections is not, and phrase that
> in an appropriate form as an override of the decision of a delegate so
> that we can be done with this and have all the options represented? Lots
> of technical problems have shown up with the current amendment that tried
> to do that and it clearly needs a revision in light of the discussion.
>
> If we're going to put all the options on the ballot, let's go ahead and
> put them *all* on the ballot so that no significant group of DDs can later
> claim that their opinion wasn't represented by the choices.
FWIW, I agree with you, however I'll only second them as I do not have enough
time to draft them.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
Reply to: