Re: GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free
On 1/25/06, Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe@paniq.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:04 -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > What would be the point of your proposal? I mean, if this proposal
> > won, it would be exactly the same as if the "no GFDL in main at all"
> > proposal won. So, why have yet another option?
> My proposal was for the "two separate GRs" setup.
> If there is not enough support for the "two separate GRs" setup, then I
> will consider modifying my proposal to fit into the "one big GR" setup.
> But I first want to see if there is any support.
That's ok, I was asking about Nathanael's option, not yours. I
understand yours, although I prefer to vote only once (thus, I prefere
the 1 GR approach).
--
Besos,
Marga
Reply to: