Re: DFSG, GFDL, and position statementsd

[Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>]

Le dimanche 22 janvier 2006 à 13:13 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> A) The delegates decision that the GFDL licensed works are non-free is
>    wrong, the GFDL meets the DFSG. Override the delegated decision,
>    and  issue the following statement "..."
> B) The delegates decision that the GFDL licensed works are non-free
>    does not hold for works without invariant sections, modify the
>    delegated decision to allow works with no invariant sections in
>    main, and issue the following statement "..."

I fail to see why these positions don't require 3:1 supermajority. As
currently, no sane interpretation of the DFSG can lead to such
statements, especially for A), we would have to modify the DFSG to fit
the requirement.
-- 
 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `'                        joss@debian.org
   `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom