[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:

> I also don't understand why we vote whether to put something on hold
> or not until we vote about it. Or at least this is what the ballot
> suggests:

It's a feature of the constitution: if a vote is held to reverse a DPL
decision then a snap vote is held to decide if the decision should stand
until the vote proper is run (section 4.2.4).

> Finally, I am getting annoyed by all these GRs and the waste of time
> that comes with them. Maybe I should thus propose a vote to resolve
> that DDs must now stop wasting time and get back to work.

Especially in this case, where it looks like the differences will be
resolved before we ever get to a vote.

"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: