On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > I also don't understand why we vote whether to put something on hold > or not until we vote about it. Or at least this is what the ballot > suggests: It's a feature of the constitution: if a vote is held to reverse a DPL decision then a snap vote is held to decide if the decision should stand until the vote proper is run (section 4.2.4). > Finally, I am getting annoyed by all these GRs and the waste of time > that comes with them. Maybe I should thus propose a vote to resolve > that DDs must now stop wasting time and get back to work. Especially in this case, where it looks like the differences will be resolved before we ever get to a vote. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature