[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal to delay the decition of the DPL of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation



On 10818 March 1977, Martin Wuertele wrote:

Seconded. The whole quote below. Ie the full proposal.

> I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and
> therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian
> constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader keeping
> the Package Policy Committee as defined[2] in place until the Debian
> Project Leader has found at least three people "who'll be active in
> maintaining policy according to the policy process"[3] and delegates
> them. Consequently the REJECT for uploads of debian-policy must be
> removed.
>
> My reason for this proposal is the impression the revocation of the
> delegation is based on the disagreement of the interpretation of the
> policy between the chair of the Package Policy Committee and the Debian
> Project Leader.
>
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/10/msg00233.html
> [2]http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00017.html
> [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/10/msg00238.html


-- 
bye Joerg
> 20. What would you do if you wanted to retire from the project?
Remove the passphrase from the (secret) gpg key and post it to
debian-devel. The keyring maintainers will lock the account ASAP.

Attachment: pgpJLLXDH2dO3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: