This is to record the reason behind my firmware GR vote (not that you are expected to mind what I think, but I wish to go on record at vote time anyway). Debian should in my view treat firmware differently than other software. Although this does not necessarily mean that Debian should distribute the firmware, trying to fit the DFSG to firmware is like trying to fit A.J.'s shoe to an elephant; the two were never made to go together. My vote: [ 1 ] Choice 1: Release Etch even with firmware [ 3 ] Choice 2: Special DFSG exception [3:1] [ 2 ] Choice 3: Further discussion Choice 2 ranks below Further Discussion mostly because I am not yet sure that granting kernel upstream a permanent special privilege the DFSG denies other upstream developers is prudent in the long term. Highly valid, deeply considered arguments have been advanced in recent weeks and recent years on many sides of the firmware debate. This is no easy issue, but on the whole, I am persuaded that a narrow application of the DFSG to firmware does not serve Debian's vision well. The hardware engineers who make firmware blobs are very differently motivated than the proprietary software predators who distribute non-free software. The firmware thus produced serves a very different role. The Debian Project would be unwise to ignore the difference. -- Thaddeus H. Black 508 Nellie's Cave Road Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA +1 540 961 0920, t@b-tk.org, thb@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature