Re: [PROPOSAL] Let's ship all firmwares included inthe pristine upstream kernel tarball in debian/etch.

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Cc: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Let's ship all firmwares included inthe pristine upstream kernel tarball in debian/etch.
From: Frederik Schueler <fs@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:17:21 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061005191721.GO21523@mail.lowpingbastards.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061005190406.GA8973@powerlinux.fr>
References: <[🔎] 20061005190406.GA8973@powerlinux.fr>

I second the following proposal:

On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:04:06PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> === START OF PROPOSAL ===
> Given the difficulty of finding a common ground about the non-free firmware
> issue, the Debian Project does resolve that :
> 
>   1) We allow inclusion in Debian Etch of all firmwares currently shipped in
>   the upstream linux kernel tarball.
> ===  END OF PROPOSAL  ===

Best regards
Frederik Schueler

-- 
ENOSIG

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- [PROPOSAL] Let's ship all firmwares included inthe pristine upstream kernel tarball in debian/etch.
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Asking for the ban of Frans Pop from debian-vote ... (Was: [AMENDMENT]: Release Etch now, with source-less but legal and freely licensed firmware)
Next by Date: ^^^ here is a no-op mail about: a so-called NO-OP vote ... […]
Previous by thread: [PROPOSAL] Let's ship all firmwares included inthe pristine upstream kernel tarball in debian/etch.
Next by thread: [AMENDMENT] Let's ship all firmwares included inthe pristine upstream kernel tarball in debian/etch, and reinclude the non-free qlogic firmware.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread