[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: State of the GR's: Part 2 - Position statement on the DPL and Dunc-Tank

Le lundi 02 octobre 2006 à 12:10 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>         A reasonable person might not like what the DPL did,. and
>  might not want to support him, but might not consider it warranting a
>  recall. 
>         So, a person might want to a) not recall, not affirm, 
>  b) not recall, affirm, or c) recall, not affirm.

All of this can be expressed with a single ballot, a) meaning NOTA
first. As there is no need to express "recall, affirm", there is no need
to write two ballots.

I don't think it matters much in this case, but I don't see anything
preventing this in the constitution, and having it in a single ballot
would make things clearer.
 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `'                        joss@debian.org
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to: