Le lundi 02 octobre 2006 à 12:10 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > A reasonable person might not like what the DPL did,. and > might not want to support him, but might not consider it warranting a > recall. > > So, a person might want to a) not recall, not affirm, > b) not recall, affirm, or c) recall, not affirm. All of this can be expressed with a single ballot, a) meaning NOTA first. As there is no need to express "recall, affirm", there is no need to write two ballots. I don't think it matters much in this case, but I don't see anything preventing this in the constitution, and having it in a single ballot would make things clearer. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=