[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [AMENDMENT] Now is not the time to decide on firmware issue



On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:18:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
>============================ START OF AMENDMENT ==========================
>Considering that:
>   (1) The current discussion about what to do with sourceless firmware
>       is muddled by other discussions and time pressure because of the
>       release of Etch.
>   (2) The subject matter is extremely complex and most developers probably
>       do not have a clear understanding of what (sub)categories of files
>       are involved, what legal and practical issues are associated with
>       each of them, and what implications a decision on them will have for
>       e.g. the usability of the Debian installation system, nor what long
>       term implications a decision may have for the project as a whole.
>
>The Debian Project:
>   (a) Affirms that the project strives for and encourages 100 percent
>       free software, including the availability of source for all types
>       of files.
>   (b) Resolves that the project needs more time before a decision can be
>       made on how sourceless firmware or other types of files (such as,
>       but not limited to, logos, images and video) are to be dealt with.
>   (c) Requests the DPL to delegate developers to prepare position papers on
>       the legal and practical issues surrounding these types of files in
>       view of both of the project's chief priorities: "free software" and
>       "our users".
>       These papers are to be presented to the project for discussion two
>       weeks before Debconf 7 and should include:
>       * a classification of the different types of files involved;
>       * a summary of legal issues with regard to the different types of
>         files;
>       * alternative technical solutions for dealing with different types
>         of files, e.g. in the archive and in the installation system;
>       * a statement about whether or not changes are needed/wanted in the
>         project's foundation documents in order to realize the proposed
>         solutions and possibly a proposal for these changes.
>   (d) Requests the DPL to facilitate the work of these teams by providing
>       access to legal counsel and other resources.
>============================= END OF AMENDMENT ===========================

Seconded.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
"When C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a thumb." -- Steven M. Haflich

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: