Re: Proposal: Recall the Project Leader
Graham Wilson <email@example.com>
> Is this a suitable compromise? Are there enough people upset with
> dunc-tank to even try to reach a compromise on the issue?
As I stated elsewhere (and was ignored by AJ at least once), I am not
particularly troubled by paying the RMs, but - as I understand it -
the dunc-tank model is flawed. I'd welcome a pragmatic attempt to
find a compromise, but I expect standing-aside is the most we can get
from some developers with irreconcilable objections to the concept.
Nevertheless, the DPL procedures have been totally screwed-up again,
so I would still support recalling AJ.
Sorry if that's not what you wanted to hear,
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct