Re: Proposal: Recall the Project Leader
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> § 5.3. Procedure
> The Project Leader should attempt to make decisions which are
> consistent with the consensus of the opinions of the Developers.
> The debate has been launched on -private, but it's clear to everyone
> that we were very far from a consensus. So, instead of *beeing
> consistent* with the *consensus* of the opinions, a so called "external"
> structure has been launched.
So, did the Debian Project Leader take the decision to fund our RMs,
for example with Debian's money? Did he take the decision to
officially request funding? NO.
Instead, he did his best to take off his DPL hat, make a private
initiative which is directed towards helping Debian, without the need
of any DPL special power.
What does he get for trying his best to gather more support for Debian?
A "let's fire the DPL" GR.
> the first
> sentence of the article is "The volunteer-based Debian GNU/Linux is
> experimenting with ..."
Why on earth are you giving a shit to some random broken article?
Would you read an article claiming that Debian buys Ubuntu stock and
then call the leader a fraud? What if the article would claim that KDE
is sluggish in Debian?
I'm deeply disappointed by the french cabal supporting this DPL
bashing. Please do feel responsible for the fate of the project after
such a stupid vote.
Loïc Minier <email@example.com>