Re: Draft ballot for the assets constitutional GR
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: [...]
> Apparently, the proposer and the secretary both felt that the
> form on the ballot was OK -- or do you have a better idea what the
> proposer of the GR wanted? [...]
If only the proposer and secretary need to be happy with the ballot,
post the draft to them only and sod the voters.
> I never said comments were not welcome. [...]
It seemed pretty clear from the response.
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct