Re: Draft ballot for the assets constitutional GR
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:56:02 +0100, MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> > Could you name the amendment on the ballot, please? "Amend the
> > constitution" is not descriptive enough.
> Since there is only one issue where voting is open, anyone who
> can't figure out what is being voted upon probably should not be
> voting. Especially since there was a link to the vote page.
Previously, the proposal has been named on the ballot, such as:
and even when there's only one option:
Also, if there is no material from the proposal in the ballot, how do
the wordings "consequently" decide the form of it? (constitution A.2.3)
Finally, if comments are unwelcome, why bother posting a draft ballot
with a message that suggests it's OK to comment?
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct