[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Draft ballot for the assets constitutional GR

Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:56:02 +0100, MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> said: 
> > Could you name the amendment on the ballot, please?  "Amend the
> > constitution" is not descriptive enough.
>         Since there is only one issue where voting is open, anyone who
>  can't figure out what is being voted upon probably should not be
>  voting. Especially since there was a link to the vote page.

Previously, the proposal has been named on the ballot, such as:
and even when there's only one option:

Also, if there is no material from the proposal in the ballot, how do 
the wordings "consequently" decide the form of it? (constitution A.2.3)

Finally, if comments are unwelcome, why bother posting a draft ballot
with a message that suggests it's OK to comment?

My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct

Reply to: