Re: Draft ballot for the assets constitutional GR
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:56:02 +0100, MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> said:
> > Could you name the amendment on the ballot, please? "Amend the
> > constitution" is not descriptive enough.
>
> Since there is only one issue where voting is open, anyone who
> can't figure out what is being voted upon probably should not be
> voting. Especially since there was a link to the vote page.
Previously, the proposal has been named on the ballot, such as:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/03/msg00003.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/06/msg00004.html
and even when there's only one option:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/06/msg00004.html
Also, if there is no material from the proposal in the ballot, how do
the wordings "consequently" decide the form of it? (constitution A.2.3)
Finally, if comments are unwelcome, why bother posting a draft ballot
with a message that suggests it's OK to comment?
Thanks,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: