Re: Proposal: The DFSG do not require source code for data, including firmware
>This discussion has indeed been going on for a while. The most important
>arguments seem to be that one side is saying "It must be Free!" while
>the other claims "There is nothing useful in making it Free".
Wrong. The real other argument is "there is nothing useful in making it
non-free". Quite a different position.
>I think the answer to that discussion can only be found in trying to
>analyse and answer these arguments. So let's try that.
Maybe you should try again after understanding what we are talking about.
>Then again, maybe I'm just crazy and don't know what I'm talking about.
>That wouldn't be a first ;-)