Re: Proposal: The DFSG do not require source code for data, including firmware
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:48:20AM +0200, Sven Luther <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> The second GR was the cosmetic change one, which left us with a
> (new to some) interpretation including fonts, documentation and firmware as
> software needing source.
Note that this consmetic change applied to the Social Contract, but not
to the guidelines themselves. The DFSG still speaks of programs and not
This is a hole that shouldn't exist in the first place...