[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: The DFSG do not require source code for data, including firmware

> Though I understand your motivation, I prefer to have this GR
> "executable" (hm, is this the right word?), i.e. a text that has as few
> as possible disambiguties. If we say "until it will become practical",
> anyone can jump up even next week to say "now it is practical". I
> however want a statement from all developers "they are not (now)".

I'm only willing to give you : They are, but I'm willing to live with it
for now as I don't have a good idea yet on what is acceptable and what

L & L


Goa is a state of mind

Reply to: