Re: GR proposal - Restricted-media amendments to the DFSG
On 1916-3.820-5.730(4sf), Wouter Verhelst <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
[So a GR can state that pi=3,]
> Language, and interpretation thereof, is not an exact science. Math is.
The representation of maths is not much more exact than language
in some ways. Two half-daft observations from a statistician:
1. a GR can state that pi=3 without necessarily being right. A GR
is a type of popularity contest, not a test of exact science.
2. a GR can state that pi=3 and be right, but make the project
use a pretty awkward default number base! (see above)
Laux nur mia opinio: vidu http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Bv sekvu http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct