Re: question for all candidates
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Martin Schulze <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2006.03.11.0010 +0100]:
> > > > It didn't have.
> > > >
> > > > The changes were underway and in discussion independently.
> > >
> > > Not trying to pick on anyone here, but the DPL team came into play
> > > and I sparked the Oldenburg security meeting idea, and *then* things
> > > started moving. If they'd been underway long before, I wouldn't be
> > > able to tell because noone was informed.
> > Wrong.
> How can any of the above be wrong? Maybe I failed to make it
> explicit that *it seemed to me* (and not only me) that things
> started moving only after...
You wrote "and then things started moving", which is wrong because
restructuring the security team was already in discussion and part
of it already implemented.
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.