[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: question for all candidates

Andreas Schuldei <andreas@debian.org> wrote:
> * Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk> [2006-03-07 20:09:11]:
>> If you were DPL right now, which teams would you consider making formal
>> delegates regardless of their wishes?
> It would depend on weather I had good additional people that
> could make (in my oppinion) a difference in team dynamics and
> performance.

Last November, you and the DPL team wanted to propose a GR that would 
have forcibly made everyone in a position of authority a formal 
delegate, and stated that you had replacements ready if they were 
unwilling to comply.

1) You now appear less willing to do so. What has changed?

2) At the time you said that you had new ftp-masters and a new security 
team ready to replace the existing ones. Does this mean that you already 
have good additional people that could (in your opinion) make a 
difference in team dynamics and performance?

3) You have previously claimed that new people were formally delegated 
to the security team during the past year. This was never announced on 
debian-devel-announce, and these delegations were never posted on 
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization . If you were unable to 
successfully add people to teams then, why do you believe you would be 
able to do so during your time as DPL?

4) You were planning to propose a GR that would have made the
ftp-masters formal delegates. However, at the time you had not actually
raised this with the ftp-masters. How does this fit with your desire for 
the project to be more open and communicative?

Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.vote@srcf.ucam.org

Reply to: