Re: DFSG4 and combined works
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 10:42:19AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> We're talking about a binary which is so integrated that it snarfs
> bits of documentation and prints them as docstrings
The integration is not very tight. The binary can work without the
auxiliary file so it can not be considered combined work with that
file. (There are cases when it is even desirable to use the binary
without that auxiliary file, for example if you want to save disk
space.)
Anton Zinoviev
Reply to: