[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

On 9 Feb 2006, Marco d'Itri told this:

> On Feb 10, Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote:
>> Surely it does.  People who say "I was deceived; and I didn't
>> bother to take elementary steps to avoid deception" have chosen to
>> be deceived.
> Well, at least now you agree that the GR title was deceiptful.
>> Were you "deceived" by the 2003 amendment?  
> No, because the second time I received the ballot I had time to
> waste and spent it reading the proposed changes. But just by reading
> the subject I would have believed too that these were trivial
> changes, just like in the precedent GR.

        Why did you not say something at that point to the effect that
 this was not an editorial change?

Biggest security gap -- an open mouth.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: