Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org> writes:
> [Christopher Martin]
>> If an issue is highly controversial, then I can think of no better
>> way of settling it in a way that most developers will accept than a
>> vote. People respect votes much more than decrees, even if they don't
>> agree with them.
>
> And yet in this very thread we *still* have people whinging about GR
> 2004-03 being "deceptive". (Yes, *after* you all had the opportunity
> in 2004-04 to repeal it, and didn't do so.) Either astounding or
> depressing.
Has anyone come forward and said "I was deceived by GR 2004-03"? I
wonder. I don't recall anyone saying that. This makes the deception
claim all the worse.
Reply to: